Tackling climate change requires not just new technology or political will but money—more money than many poor countries have. This means new sources of finance must be found if we are to keep global temperature rises within limits like 1.5 or even 2 degrees Celsius. The problem is that most “climate finance” fails the test of additionality—we need additional money for additional carbon reduction.
Latest Post
- COP29: What does the $300B mean for the global south?
- COP29 climate talks end with $300 billion annual pledge, Guterres calls deal a ‘base to build on’
- Carbon markets could boost climate action in least developed countries
- ‘Pay up or humanity will pay the price’, Guterres warns at COP29 climate summit
- Why everyone exaggerates “climate finance”
- COP29 unpacked: 8 critical topics driving the climate agenda in Baku
- What Could the New Climate Finance Goal Look Like 2024
- Harnessing the power of parliamentarians to end the global learning crisis
- 5 Highlights to Expect at COP29 in Baku
- Navigating COP 16: Insights on Unifying Action for Climate and Nature